| Court | Civil Court · Judgment |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-23 |
| Published | JMO-0030 |
| Keywords | harassment.criminal.procedure.detention.complaint |
| Summary | The plaintiff, VIDE_KK12, filed a complaint after detaining the defendant, lavenderZOMG, alleging that the defendant disrespected the plaintiff in direct messages, blocked and later unblocked the plaintiff, and continued to harass the plaintiff. The parties agreed that the matter would be treated as criminal rather than civil. No formal charge is recorded in the file, but the court found the defendant guilty of harassment based on the material on file. The court imposed a sentence of 120 LJs on the defendant and entered judgment to the Inquisition dossier of lavenderZOMG. |
| Procedural history | Complaint filed; counsel for lavenderZOMG noted; the defence indicated it had five witnesses to call; the file was read and passed by a clerk; the clerk of the court took the bench; the parties agreed the case would be treated as criminal rather than civil; an assistant judge was on the case; judgment entered and written to the Inquisition dossier; matter concluded. |
| Parties | CLAIMANT: VIDE_KK12 RESPONDENT: lavenderZOMG RESPONDENT COUNSEL: lavenderZOMG |
| Author | belmov |
| Last updated | 2026-08-23 |
| References in the text | None cited |
(1)
1. Judge belmov: The case concerns a complaint by VIDE_KK12 against lavenderZOMG arising from events described in private messages and from the detention of the defendant.
(2)
2. The material on file consists primarily of the complaint in which the plaintiff states that after detaining the defendant he sought to conduct an investigation and that the defendant disrespected him in direct messages, blocked him during the investigation, and later unblocked him and continued to disrespect and harass him.
(3)
3. The complaint lists a number of alleged offences including Disrespect of a Lawful Officer, Failure to Comply, Assault, Murder, Capital Criminal Action and Harassment; the record shows the matter proceeded on the basis of the harassment allegation.
(4)
4. The record states that there is no formal charge recorded in the file. The parties agreed that the matter should be treated as criminal rather than civil and the complaint was described as wrongly filed as a civil matter.
(5)
5. The defence indicated that it had five witnesses it would like to call during the trial and that those witnesses would be enumerated when required. It is Not stated in the record whether those witnesses were called or heard.
(6)
6. The file was read and passed by a clerk and the clerk of the court took the bench; an assistant judge is noted on the case. Further procedural details and any pretrial rulings are Not stated in the record.
(7)
7. Having considered the complaint and the material on file, the court concluded that the defendant's conduct, as alleged, amounted to harassment. The court's assessment is recorded as the basis for the conviction.
(8)
8. The court entered judgment finding the defendant guilty of harassment. The judgment was written to the Inquisition dossier of lavenderZOMG.
(9)
9. The sentence imposed upon the defendant was 120 LJs. The record does not state the legal basis or sentencing guidelines applied in determining that term.
(10)
10. The matter is recorded as concluded in the case file. Any remedies, fines beyond the stated sentence, or other follow-up measures are Not stated in the record.
CONCLUSION:
1. 1. The defendant, lavenderZOMG, is found guilty of harassment.
2. 2. The defendant is sentenced to 120 LJs.
3. 3. Judgment is entered and written to the Inquisition dossier of lavenderZOMG.
4. 4. The case is closed and the matter is concluded.
The verdict
Guilty of harassment
The sentence
120 LJs by defendant
The ruling of the Judicial Ministry in this matter. The official prior-decision document has not been published yet. · Public link
No sign-in is needed to read this document.